It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum

Topics => World/Foreign Affairs => Topic started by: Libertas on February 24, 2011, 08:14:23 AM

Title: Palin on Libya
Post by: Libertas on February 24, 2011, 08:14:23 AM
Palin, not in office, acting Presidential...Obama, in office, acting like a mom-jeans-wearing pantywaist!

http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/02/real-leadership-sarah-palin-calls-in-nato-to-save-libyan-people-nato-responds/ (http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/02/real-leadership-sarah-palin-calls-in-nato-to-save-libyan-people-nato-responds/)
Title: Re: Palin on Libya
Post by: IronDioPriest on February 24, 2011, 09:31:44 AM
This isn't the first time this has happened - where everyone is wondering why Obammy is awol on an issue that clearly screams for presidential commentary or intervention - and then Palin comes out forcefully with the right answer.

I tell ya, if this woman's presidential potential are truly as irrevocably damaged as pretty much everyone would have us believe, America will be missing out on a great leader.
Title: Re: Palin on Libya
Post by: John Florida on February 24, 2011, 10:07:12 AM
Palin, not in office, acting Presidential...Obama, in office, acting like a mom-jeans-wearing pantywaist!

http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/02/real-leadership-sarah-palin-calls-in-nato-to-save-libyan-people-nato-responds/ (http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/02/real-leadership-sarah-palin-calls-in-nato-to-save-libyan-people-nato-responds/)

 What do you mean "acting"?? He is a pantywaist.
Title: Re: Palin on Libya
Post by: Libertas on February 24, 2011, 10:14:07 AM
Palin, not in office, acting Presidential...Obama, in office, acting like a mom-jeans-wearing pantywaist!

http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/02/real-leadership-sarah-palin-calls-in-nato-to-save-libyan-people-nato-responds/ (http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/02/real-leadership-sarah-palin-calls-in-nato-to-save-libyan-people-nato-responds/)

 What do you mean "acting"?? He is a pantywaist.

I stand corrected!

 ::thumbsup::