It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum
Topics => General Board => Topic started by: Libertas on March 15, 2011, 11:17:34 AM
-
Guests, feel free to register & join the discussion! (http://itsaboutliberty.com)
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/03/15/white-house-supreme-court/ (http://michellemalkin.com/2011/03/15/white-house-supreme-court/)
Dear White House,
Up yours!
::mooning::
Sincerely,
-The Supremes
Make it so!
::thumbsup::
-
The Obama administration told the Supreme Court on Monday night it should stay away from a high-profile challenge to the 2010 health care law until after a lower court has had a chance to review the case.
UFB. They "told". He and his administration are setting themselves up for a major USSC ass-kicking - he keeps giving them all the reason in the world.
-
Roberts should solicit plaintiffs and schedule a decision now.
-
Roberts should solicit plaintiffs and schedule a decision now.
I believe that there has been a request for a direct appeal from a U.S. District Court decision . (Florida??) I'll run it down.
-
Bam! There is already a legal filing to accomplish direct appeal.
Read this:
http://www.suite101.com/content/us-appeals-fl-obamacare-case-supreme-ct-may-be-next-via-va-writ-a357577 (http://www.suite101.com/content/us-appeals-fl-obamacare-case-supreme-ct-may-be-next-via-va-writ-a357577)
Judge Vinson had given an option of filing such an appeal with the Atlanta court or filing a request for a direct appeal to US Supreme Court under the Supreme Court’s Rule 11 that allows skipping the Court of Appeal in certain circumstances. Even an expedited schedule in the Court of Appeal is likely to mean a year or more before the case gets to the Supreme Court, and perhaps another year before the Court gives its decision. This is despite some expectations that the final word regarding the issues raised by the ACA will come from the Supreme Court.
Read more at Suite101: US Appeals FL Obamacare Case, Supreme Ct. May Be Next Via VA Writ http://www.suite101.com/content/us-appeals-fl-obamacare-case-supreme-ct-may-be-next-via-va-writ-a357577#ixzz1Ggbr71Er (http://www.suite101.com/content/us-appeals-fl-obamacare-case-supreme-ct-may-be-next-via-va-writ-a357577#ixzz1Ggbr71Er)
-
If this White House is so confident obamacare is constitutional, one would think they would welcome the Supremes to jump in quickly.
But this is how chicago politics operate...it's better to throw out a warning rather than search for the truth.
On a sidenote, I remember how Bush was bashed for not responding to crisis. How many crisis must America and the world endure before obama speaks? Or better yet, acts? (sidenote: not that I want him to, but he is supposedly the leader of the greatest country of the free world)
-
You can take the Chicago street punk out of Chicago... ::mooning::
As for Judge Vinson?! ::bows:: ::cool::
-
Bam! There is already a legal filing to accomplish direct appeal.
Read this:
http://www.suite101.com/content/us-appeals-fl-obamacare-case-supreme-ct-may-be-next-via-va-writ-a357577 (http://www.suite101.com/content/us-appeals-fl-obamacare-case-supreme-ct-may-be-next-via-va-writ-a357577)
Judge Vinson had given an option of filing such an appeal with the Atlanta court or filing a request for a direct appeal to US Supreme Court under the Supreme Court’s Rule 11 that allows skipping the Court of Appeal in certain circumstances. Even an expedited schedule in the Court of Appeal is likely to mean a year or more before the case gets to the Supreme Court, and perhaps another year before the Court gives its decision. This is despite some expectations that the final word regarding the issues raised by the ACA will come from the Supreme Court.
Read more at Suite101: US Appeals FL Obamacare Case, Supreme Ct. May Be Next Via VA Writ http://www.suite101.com/content/us-appeals-fl-obamacare-case-supreme-ct-may-be-next-via-va-writ-a357577#ixzz1Ggbr71Er (http://www.suite101.com/content/us-appeals-fl-obamacare-case-supreme-ct-may-be-next-via-va-writ-a357577#ixzz1Ggbr71Er)
So should we extrapolate then that the White House's demand that SCOTUS defer hearing appeals until lower courts have heard them was made in direct response to this ruling?