It would be one thing if it were merely say, blasphemous, as in "The Last Temptation of Christ"
I thought that was a pretty good movie, myself. Sure it took a few liberties, but not that big of liberties, IMHO.
I don't think it's that much of a stretch to think that Jesus dreamed about girls. He was human. What would you rather have, Jesus dreaming about men?!
I don't think it's that much of a stretch to think that Jesus gave the go ahead to Judas, to turn Jesus in, to get the crucifixion ball rolling.
I think there's a big difference between taking a few liberties with the given narrative, and all this modern drek dishing up disrespect and snark.
But I do remember, being a theater employee, a lot of people had huge problems with this film.
You are agreeing with me. TLTOC took liberties with the source material and, being a biblical based story, that, by definition, makes it blasphemous and gives adherents to Scripture a reason to dislike it. So, other than that, though, it appeared to be a well crafted piece of cinema.
Noah does not appear to have the same "art" pedigree. It seems, based on what we have been told, to be a mishmash of genres that does not deviate slightly from Scripture but rather hugely by imagining things that are preposterous (from a biblical point of view).
-Noah hating humanity
-Implying that God tells Noah to kill his family
-Noah being sort of indifferent to God
-The rock people nonsense
-Noah as a vegan
-Noah as an environmental nut
-Noah's family as sex maniacs (sex outside marriage, etc.)
Certainly, as a screenplay writer, one can extrapolate something from the few bible verses that make up the account of the flood story. I can conceive of a decent story that could be made without going to the extremes that this clod did. Seriously, the only things missing from this already bizarre Noah are space aliens and zombies and, honestly, I don't know why they were left out.