Okay, gotcha, IDP; but I'm saying "who decides what's "fair"? He's trying to make a point based on a faulty premise. Is it un"fair" that I'm not basketball material? Oh, hell no; it's just what IS. One goes down the "fair" road, even while repudiating the outcome, and one is already in the wrong because the minute the outcome is judged as "poor" for my future in basketball, the next faulty premise is that I've been somehow injured. Prager, stands there, but avers my injury is not worth the cost to the general population, but, what if it isn't? What if it costs little to remediate my "lack"? Should y'all not endeavor to fix that for me if it costs you nothing?
I say NO. I need to deal with whatever perceived shortcomings I'm dealt and make the most of my assets. "Fair" is not an item on the menu.