It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum
Topics => Media Bias/Media War => Topic started by: Libertas on April 08, 2014, 11:49:13 AM
-
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/04/07/get-the-f-out-of-here-msnbcs-ed-schultz-explodes-on-radio-caller-live-on-the-air/ (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/04/07/get-the-f-out-of-here-msnbcs-ed-schultz-explodes-on-radio-caller-live-on-the-air/)
The prototypical progressive bully who can never take the shyt he dishes out 24/7...
Talk about Hate Radio, this douchenozzle is the poster boy of Hate Radio!!!
-
Levin has done the same thing, minus the outright insults and expletives -- "get off my phone!"
-
Rush used to have the "caller abortions", he should bring those back...
As always though, even in this libiots are better treated by conservatives than vice-versa...
Some things will never change...
-
Rush used to have the "caller abortions", he should bring those back...
As always though, even in this libiots are better treated by conservatives than vice-versa...
Some things will never change...
The Left will always have a certain tactical advantage rooted in the fact that we have morals and they don't. Oh they have their rules, and will ape a sense of moral certitude for the purpose of claiming the high ground, but their rules are ever changing and always boil down to whatever is most beneficial to them at a particular time. Alinsky recognized this and that's why one of his fundamental rules is to make the enemy abide by his own code, even as you have none yourself.
It's an advantage, but a tactical one. I think it's a strategic weakness. It's always easier to be the nihilist, the destroyer, than it is to be the builder and maintainer. But that advantage is merely an early one, and is soon exhausted.
-
Rush used to have the "caller abortions", he should bring those back...
As always though, even in this libiots are better treated by conservatives than vice-versa...
Some things will never change...
The Left will always have a certain tactical advantage rooted in the fact that we have morals and they don't. Oh they have their rules, and will ape a sense of moral certitude for the purpose of claiming the high ground, but their rules are ever changing and always boil down to whatever is most beneficial to them at a particular time. Alinsky recognized this and that's why one of his fundamental rules is to make the enemy abide by his own code, even as you have none yourself.
It's an advantage, but a tactical one. I think it's a strategic weakness. It's always easier to be the nihilist, the destroyer, than it is to be the builder and maintainer. But that advantage is merely an early one, and is soon exhausted.
Agreed. Their failure is manifest when the destruction has wrought its angst and once that energy is depleted there is nothing there for them to build with...from the ruins and chaos other forces (often ones nobody wants) fill the vacuum and the next cycle begins...
Roundheads, Jacobins, Bolsheviks...