It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum

Topics => 2nd Amendment/Firearms => Topic started by: Libertas on July 30, 2015, 07:18:07 AM

Title: LA bans magazines over 10 rounds
Post by: Libertas on July 30, 2015, 07:18:07 AM
http://www.weaselzippers.us/230381-los-angeles-bans-possession-of-magazines-containing-more-than-10-rounds/ (http://www.weaselzippers.us/230381-los-angeles-bans-possession-of-magazines-containing-more-than-10-rounds/)

Embrace your new criminal status, or comply to statist dictate...or effing leave and never go back.

Pick one.
Title: Re: LA bans magazines over 10 rounds
Post by: ToddF on July 30, 2015, 08:48:13 AM
Quote
“People who want to defend their families don’t need a 100-round drum magazine and an automatic weapon to do it,” Councilman Paul Krekorian (D.)

How much do you want to bet this Real Retard of Genius is a ....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Krekorian (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Krekorian)

Quote
After graduating with a B.A. in Political Science from USC...

Political Science.  Because learning the difference between a type of firearm and types of magazines was just too darn hard for those special children on campus.
Title: Re: LA bans magazines over 10 rounds
Post by: Glock32 on July 30, 2015, 09:43:34 AM
Quote
“People who want to defend their families don’t need a 100-round drum magazine and an automatic weapon to do it,” Councilman Paul Krekorian (D.)


If what they're defending themselves from are the armed agents of the state, then they just might.
Title: Re: LA bans magazines over 10 rounds
Post by: Libertas on July 30, 2015, 11:21:48 AM
Quote
“People who want to defend their families don’t need a 100-round drum magazine and an automatic weapon to do it,” Councilman Paul Krekorian (D.)


If what they're defending themselves from are the armed agents of the state, then they just might.

As well as the zombies this PolySciTard helps perpetuate...

(http://i585.photobucket.com/albums/ss291/libertasinfinitio/Warnings/massacexn6ww1.gif)

And how much you wanna bet that when the shat hits the fan, low-ranking trash like this will retreat behind gates and some may have dreaded (banned?) weapons themselves...while they wait for the Obamacopters to rescue them (only to find they don't rank that high after all)?

Seeing crap like this get theirs is going to be common entertainment.
Title: Re: LA bans magazines over 10 rounds
Post by: Alphabet Soup on July 30, 2015, 02:07:51 PM
I guarantee that the gates won't be high enough, the guards persistent or engaged enough, or the ammo plentiful enough.

And when the levee breaks have no place to stay....
Title: Re: LA bans magazines over 10 rounds
Post by: richb on August 03, 2015, 06:27:15 PM
Quote
“People who want to defend their families don’t need a 100-round drum magazine and an automatic weapon to do it,” Councilman Paul Krekorian (D.)


If what they're defending themselves from are the armed agents of the state, then they just might.

As well as the zombies this PolySciTard helps perpetuate...

(http://i585.photobucket.com/albums/ss291/libertasinfinitio/Warnings/massacexn6ww1.gif)

And how much you wanna bet that when the shat hits the fan, low-ranking trash like this will retreat behind gates and some may have dreaded (banned?) weapons themselves...while they wait for the Obamacopters to rescue them (only to find they don't rank that high after all)?

Seeing crap like this get theirs is going to be common entertainment.

Its has happened already in Benghazi.   Even the gay ambassador wasn't ranked high enough for rescue.   
Title: Re: LA bans magazines over 10 rounds
Post by: Libertas on August 04, 2015, 06:51:01 AM
What goes around...will come around...and usually slap you four times harder!