It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum
Topics => World/Foreign Affairs => Topic started by: Libertas on July 01, 2019, 08:26:14 AM
-
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/06/28/europe/russia-arctic-floating-nuclear-power-station-intl/index.html
I have to admit, that is a catchy tag. Had to be GP not CNN coming up with these.
Better than a "Floating Chernobyl"...the latter just does not flow as nice...even "Floating Fukashima" would be better.
Anywho...not sure the danger is all that real, not for what the Eco-Terrorists fear anyway, Arctic can be rough and tumble...but the bigger danger to me is mechanical failure or a leak...or a terrorist action. Regardless of the dangers, nothing is going to stop Russia from exploiting the hell out of Arctic resources.
-
If we built one could we call it "Baked Alaska"?
::pokeineye::
-
If we built one could we call it "Baked Alaska"?
::pokeineye::
Call it anything but late to Draenor ....