It's About Liberty: A Conservative Forum

Topics => Judiciary, Crime, & Courts => Topic started by: Libertas on August 09, 2013, 11:44:11 AM

Title: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: Libertas on August 09, 2013, 11:44:11 AM
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/08/09/people-vs-peeper-ny-judge-approves-artists-right-to-photograph-children-through-windows-of-their-homes/ (http://weaselzippers.us/2013/08/09/people-vs-peeper-ny-judge-approves-artists-right-to-photograph-children-through-windows-of-their-homes/)

If he's peeking in your home and pressing a camera trigger you stick a barrel at him and depress a gun trigger!   ;)
Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: Pandora on August 09, 2013, 12:49:36 PM
The damn judge, like so many others, has a screw loose.

"... Rakower ruled Monday that Svenson’s artistic freedom superseded their privacy concerns, and dismissed the case outright.

“The value of artistic expression outweighs any sale that stems from the published photos,”"
Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: Libertas on August 09, 2013, 02:33:30 PM
Makes me want to artistically stomp the crap out of libiots...and put their pics on my art-centric website for all to enjoy...reprints offered for a nominal fee of course!

 ::evilbat::
Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: LadyVirginia on August 09, 2013, 05:51:03 PM
The damn judge, like so many others, has a screw loose.

"... Rakower ruled Monday that Svenson’s artistic freedom superseded their privacy concerns, and dismissed the case outright.

“The value of artistic expression outweighs any sale that stems from the published photos,”"

It's this phony "balancing" act that these judges engage in that makes me sick.  These kids' privacy rights were violated.  Done.

Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: warpmine on August 10, 2013, 10:03:41 AM
The damn judge, like so many others, has a screw loose.

"... Rakower ruled Monday that Svenson’s artistic freedom superseded their privacy concerns, and dismissed the case outright.

“The value of artistic expression outweighs any sale that stems from the published photos,”"

It's this phony "balancing" act that these judges engage in that makes me sick.  These kids' privacy rights were violated.  Done.
Same idiots that haven't a care in the world voting for Weinerettes everywhere. Its all good to them no matter the dire consequences.

We'll never get anywhere without the war and what must surely follow afterwards, the destruction of liberal judges and their fellow travelers.
Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: AlanS on August 10, 2013, 10:34:19 AM
1) So walking up to a window and looking in labels him a peeping tom, but he can take pics and it's OK?

2) He takes pics of strangers' children. I find that creepy and suspicious. That should warrant checking ALL of his pics for kiddie porn.
Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: LadyVirginia on August 10, 2013, 11:54:03 AM
1) So walking up to a window and looking in labels him a peeping tom, but he can take pics and it's OK?

2) He takes pics of strangers' children. I find that creepy and suspicious. That should warrant checking ALL of his pics for kiddie porn.

He figured out he needs to call it ART.

Let's see --what can we do and call it art? ::evilbat::
Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: AlanS on August 10, 2013, 04:59:25 PM
1) So walking up to a window and looking in labels him a peeping tom, but he can take pics and it's OK?

2) He takes pics of strangers' children. I find that creepy and suspicious. That should warrant checking ALL of his pics for kiddie porn.

He figured out he needs to call it ART.

Let's see --what can we do and call it art? ::evilbat::

I'm willing to burn the Quran.
Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: warpmine on August 10, 2013, 09:49:33 PM
1) So walking up to a window and looking in labels him a peeping tom, but he can take pics and it's OK?

2) He takes pics of strangers' children. I find that creepy and suspicious. That should warrant checking ALL of his pics for kiddie porn.

He figured out he needs to call it ART.

Let's see --what can we do and call it art? ::evilbat::

I'm willing to burn the Quran.
I'm willing to hang them from gallows from the old west and call it dead ringer art.
Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: Libertas on August 11, 2013, 07:01:47 PM
1) So walking up to a window and looking in labels him a peeping tom, but he can take pics and it's OK?

2) He takes pics of strangers' children. I find that creepy and suspicious. That should warrant checking ALL of his pics for kiddie porn.

He figured out he needs to call it ART.

Let's see --what can we do and call it art? ::evilbat::

I'm willing to burn the Quran.

...and use that rag for emergency toilet paper!
Title: Re: Manhatten Judge OK Peepers "Art" Freedom over Peolpe's Privacy and Kid's Safety
Post by: Libertas on August 11, 2013, 07:02:17 PM
1) So walking up to a window and looking in labels him a peeping tom, but he can take pics and it's OK?

2) He takes pics of strangers' children. I find that creepy and suspicious. That should warrant checking ALL of his pics for kiddie porn.

He figured out he needs to call it ART.

Let's see --what can we do and call it art? ::evilbat::

I'm willing to burn the Quran.
I'm willing to hang them from gallows from the old west and call it dead ringer art.

Don't forget the NEA grant to fund it!   ;)