Topic: Unreal, Russia shat-talks US on nukes, gets a UN pass & wants nuke plant on moon

[Libertas]

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/un-nuclear-ban-treaty-has-no-clothes

Such a joke.

And this...

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/russia-mulls-putting-nuclear-power-plant-moon

Imperial Russia and Communist China holding nuclear hands on the moon...

Hello new space race...

[patentlymn]

I do not understand the nuke plants on the moon. I am guessing they are part of some lunar lander.
Also, Russia has an existing nuclear power program that regularly makes and fuels nuke plants for export. The US does so erratically.

[benb61]

I do not understand the nuke plants on the moon. I am guessing they are part of some lunar lander.
Also, Russia has an existing nuclear power program that regularly makes and fuels nuke plants for export. The US does so erratically.

Nuclear power on the moon means no refueling of that power source for a long time, solar panels would require regular maintenance and any outpost on the moon would rather just throw a switch and have power 24/7/365.

[patentlymn]

I do not understand the nuke plants on the moon. I am guessing they are part of some lunar lander.
Also, Russia has an existing nuclear power program that regularly makes and fuels nuke plants for export. The US does so erratically.

Nuclear power on the moon means no refueling of that power source for a long time, solar panels would require regular maintenance and any outpost on the moon would rather just throw a switch and have power 24/7/365.

If it was to power another thing that would require a human to connect the two, correct?

[benb61]

I do not understand the nuke plants on the moon. I am guessing they are part of some lunar lander.
Also, Russia has an existing nuclear power program that regularly makes and fuels nuke plants for export. The US does so erratically.

Nuclear power on the moon means no refueling of that power source for a long time, solar panels would require regular maintenance and any outpost on the moon would rather just throw a switch and have power 24/7/365.

If it was to power another thing that would require a human to connect the two, correct?

Not necessarily, lots of automation planned for lunar activity.

[patentlymn]

I do not understand the nuke plants on the moon. I am guessing they are part of some lunar lander.
Also, Russia has an existing nuclear power program that regularly makes and fuels nuke plants for export. The US does so erratically.

Nuclear power on the moon means no refueling of that power source for a long time, solar panels would require regular maintenance and any outpost on the moon would rather just throw a switch and have power 24/7/365.

If it was to power another thing that would require a human to connect the two, correct?

Not necessarily, lots of automation planned for lunar activity.

Huey, Dewey, and Lewey needed.
https://youtu.be/3Bzt-g-9_GI?list=PLZbXA4lyCtqqUvy8jfr4rwmbImp3OHRUZ&t=7

[Libertas]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/russian-space-nuclear-weapon-could-devastate-satellites-in-low-earth-orbit-pentagon-official-5642113?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily

Soon as it is put in orbit...end it.