Author Topic: Alabama Bans U.N. Agenda 21 Sovereignty Surrender  (Read 935 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19530
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Alabama Bans U.N. Agenda 21 Sovereignty Surrender
« on: June 07, 2012, 10:44:44 PM »
Quote
After Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's stunning triumph over the excesses and abuses of public-sector unions, the London Telegraph's James Delingpole, an indefatigable opponent of global warming fraud, opined in a piece titled, "How Wisconsin And Alabama Helped Save The World," that we should take note of "an equally important but perhaps less well-publicized victory won in the Alabama House and Senate over the U.N.'s malign and insidious Agenda 21."

Agenda 21 is one of those compacts, like Law of the Sea, Kyoto and New START, that are supported by an apologetic administration with a fondness for the redistribution of American power and wealth on a local and global scale.

... Agenda 21 has not been ratified by the U.S. Senate, but it may not have to be if in a second Obama term the Environmental Protection Agency pursues it by stealth, as it has other environmental agendas that make war on the free enterprise system and rights we hold dear.

One of those is property rights. "Land ... cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market," Agenda 21 says.

"Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes."

Not liking the sound of that, Alabama recently passed Senate Bill 477 unanimously in both of its houses. The legislation bars the taking of private property in Alabama without due process and says that "Alabama and all political subdivisions may not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in or traceable to Agenda 21."

Agenda 21 is intended to foster what environmentalists call "sustainable development" in the belief that man since the Industrial Revolution has been a plague on the planet, plundering its resources while destroying nature and putting the world at risk of disastrous climate change, poverty and disease.

Three cheers for Alabama!  Can we be like Alabama, in addition to being like Mississippi?!

http://news.investors.com/article/614173/201206071903/alabama-fights-un-agenda-21-land-grab.htm
« Last Edit: June 07, 2012, 10:56:23 PM by Pandora »
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Online Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19530
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Re: Alabama Bans U.N. Agenda 21 Sovereignty Surrender
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2012, 11:08:12 PM »
Oh!  There is a page two.  Isn't this just stellar.

Quote
At the end of March, EPA administrator Lisa Jackson jetted off to Paris' ministerial meeting of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, as the press release put it, "to discuss the agency's international efforts on urban sustainability."

Excuse us, but "urban sustainability" at the behest of global organizations is not what the EPA was created to do.

Jackson will represent the U.S. at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, which will be held June 20-22 in Rio de Janeiro.

"Specifically, in a transition to a green economy, public policies will need to be used strategically to reorient consumption, investments and other economic activities," a U.N. document describing the conference explains.

The EPA's war on coal, its regulating carbon dioxide as a pollutant and its regulatory abuses including the use of drones to spy on American farmers are key parts of this international agenda that Jackson says "is the rarest of opportunities to truly change the world. ... It means working together to strengthen the effectiveness of environmental governance."

We don't need "environmental governance," just a governance of, by and for the people of the United States.

Nor do we need to "reorient" our consumption and economic activities.

Alabama has just told the U.N. and the EPA what they need to be told — don't tread on us.

Aaaaad here she is; just one of them that needs a good, swift kick in the ass.

"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Glock32

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 8747
  • Get some!
Re: Alabama Bans U.N. Agenda 21 Sovereignty Surrender
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2012, 11:35:00 PM »
Jetting off to Paris for a conference that could just as easily be held electronically isn't very "green" is it?
"The Fourth Estate is less honorable than the First Profession."

- Yours Truly

Online Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64322
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Alabama Bans U.N. Agenda 21 Sovereignty Surrender
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2012, 08:07:24 AM »
Jetting off to Paris for a conference that could just as easily be held electronically isn't very "green" is it?

No, but don't expect those mindless greenies to notice...they're too busy protesting productivity and prosperity to notice anything so mundane as that!

 ::unknowncomic::

Oh, and just like FL & WI et all...wake up states, join the fight!  This is our last chance to save the republic!
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline BMG

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1320
Re: Alabama Bans U.N. Agenda 21 Sovereignty Surrender
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2012, 08:28:12 AM »
Quote
After Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker's stunning triumph over the excesses and abuses of public-sector unions, the London Telegraph's James Delingpole, an indefatigable opponent of global warming fraud, opined in a piece titled, "How Wisconsin And Alabama Helped Save The World," that we should take note of "an equally important but perhaps less well-publicized victory won in the Alabama House and Senate over the U.N.'s malign and insidious Agenda 21."

Agenda 21 is one of those compacts, like Law of the Sea, Kyoto and New START, that are supported by an apologetic administration with a fondness for the redistribution of American power and wealth on a local and global scale.

... Agenda 21 has not been ratified by the U.S. Senate, but it may not have to be if in a second Obama term the Environmental Protection Agency pursues it by stealth, as it has other environmental agendas that make war on the free enterprise system and rights we hold dear.

One of those is property rights. "Land ... cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market," Agenda 21 says.

"Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes."

Not liking the sound of that, Alabama recently passed Senate Bill 477 unanimously in both of its houses. The legislation bars the taking of private property in Alabama without due process and says that "Alabama and all political subdivisions may not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in or traceable to Agenda 21."

Agenda 21 is intended to foster what environmentalists call "sustainable development" in the belief that man since the Industrial Revolution has been a plague on the planet, plundering its resources while destroying nature and putting the world at risk of disastrous climate change, poverty and disease.

Three cheers for Alabama!  Can we be like Alabama, in addition to being like Mississippi?!

http://news.investors.com/article/614173/201206071903/alabama-fights-un-agenda-21-land-grab.htm


 ::clapping::
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” 
- Patrick Henry

"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates."
- Tacitus

Offline EW1(SG)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 338
  • Who? Me?
    • EW1's Intercept Log
Re: Alabama Bans U.N. Agenda 21 Sovereignty Surrender
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2012, 09:02:43 AM »
Hip! Hip! Hurrah!
My doctor told me to start killing people.  Not in those exact words, she said I had to reduce the stress in my life.

Same thing.

Offline IronDioPriest

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 10830
  • I refuse to accept my civil servants as my rulers
Re: Alabama Bans U.N. Agenda 21 Sovereignty Surrender
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2012, 10:42:53 AM »
Federal lawsuit by the Obama administration against the State of Alabama coming in 3...2...1...
"A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means."

- Thomas Jefferson

Online Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 64322
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: Alabama Bans U.N. Agenda 21 Sovereignty Surrender
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2012, 11:37:09 AM »
Federal lawsuit by the Obama administration against the State of Alabama coming in 3...2...1...

Yeah, no doubt...but, they had to know that possibility to start with, so not holding firm makes little sense.
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.