Topic: Melinda gates channels Margaret Sanger

[warpmine]

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/07/12/melinda-gates-population-control-solution-to-poverty/

Wasn't sure which topic to put this little gem so "general" it is.

What is it about some people that truly believe that population control falls under their "We're rich, henceforth we know better than you. A bitter taste below.


Empowering women, reducing poverty and improving the overall health and well-being of women and children are noble goals. As with all great visions, however, the devil is in the details. Melinda Gates claims that the key to reducing poverty is to flood the developing world with contraceptives and abortifacients.

A cornerstone of this effort is the development of a new injectable contraceptive that would be analogous to the currently available medroxyprogesterone acetate also known as DMPA, or by its brand name Depo-Provera. Unlike Depo Provera, which requires an intramuscular injection and must be administered by a medical professional, this new form is a self-administered subcutaneous injection. Ms. Gates hopes that her efforts will bring contraception to at least an additional 120 million women worldwide, with the primary focus being in sub-Saharan African and South Asia.

But what exactly is Ms. Gates offering these women? Her “solution” will result in the death of countless newly conceived children, it may double the transmission rates of HIV and it will certainly increase the risks for breast cancer. In addition, progestin-only contraceptives are associated with a significant risk for blood clots and strokes.

There are two mechanisms of action for injectable contraceptives like Depo Provera to prevent pregnancy. The first is to prevent ovulation so that conception does not occur. However, if this mechanism is unsuccessful and conception does occur, Depo Provera keeps the lining of the uterus so thin that implantation will not occur. The result is that the newly conceived life is aborted.

In promoting her cause, Ms. Gates links her efforts to expand contraceptive use to the fight against HIV/AIDS. However, use of an injectable contraception offers no protection against HIV transmission. In fact, researchers from the University of Washington studied women in Africa and found that the use of DMPA doubled the transmission rates of HIV. They cited three mechanisms to account for this increase. First, the hormonal contraceptives cause the vaginal lining to thin and develop small tears that increase the exposure to HIV during sex. Secondly, the hormonal contraceptives weaken the immune system and reduce a woman’s ability to repel HIV infection. Finally, women who are HIV positive and take hormonal contraceptives shed more HIV virus, making them more infectious.

Clearly, increased use of an injectable hormonal contraceptive is not going to help the fight against AIDS.

Hormonal contraceptives are also associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer. In a 2012 study published in the Journal of Cancer Research, researchers from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center looked specifically at DMPA and found that it doubled the risk of breast cancer. Pushing for expanded use of a drug that doubles the breast cancer risk in developing countries with limited capacity for routine screening for breast cancer is illogical and borders on reckless. So why would the Gates Foundation advocate such a medically risky solution to the poverty of developing countries?

[Libertas]

Killing off the host population, all undesireables, yup that's Sanger all right.

And people won't blink an eye but they'll be quick to call conservative soutions racist, sexist and evil.

The world is upside down.

[Pandora]

Gates, and people like her, are going about the work of "helping" exactly backward.  It's not the babies/population increases that are the problem, it is the poverty.  Women in developed countries, where poverty is not THE issue, set about reducing their population voluntarily; the richer they are, the fewer children they have, generally.

The poverty in these countries stems from the lack of rule of law and private property rights and that can be lain at the feet of their governments.  There's not much Gates et al. can do about that, short of throwing money at dictators, and they're not above doing that as well.  For them, it's not so much "does it work?", but what their intentions are/were.

About the HIV/AIDS transmission -- it's been documented elsewhere that African men prefer dry intercourse, so the women there have been using herbs intravaginally as an accommodation method, which is another reason for the easy spread of the disease due to tissue damage.