Author Topic: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES  (Read 81377 times)

0 Members and 78 Guests are viewing this topic.

CatholicCrusader

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #80 on: September 14, 2012, 07:47:07 PM »

Wait a second:


The official statement from the embassy website:

    The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions.


Don't we hear Democrats insulting Romneys Mormonism every day?








Offline ChrstnHsbndFthr

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1003
    • Affordable Bail Bonds of NC, LLC
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #81 on: September 14, 2012, 08:19:45 PM »
yes...so what else is new?
“My mission today is to go forth and tell people about why I follow Christ and also what the Bible teaches, and part of that teaching is that women and men are meant to be together.

“However, I would never treat anyone with disrespect just because they are different from me. We are all created by the Almighty and like Him, I love all of humanity. We would all be better off if we loved God and loved each other.”
Phil Robertson an elder in the church of Christ

Offline Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19533
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #82 on: September 15, 2012, 12:51:53 AM »
Why not ...

At every embassy station 4 snipers and 8 spotters at stragic, defensable locations on roof tops or at least the highest ground possible.  The 12 would be connected electronically (ear buds, micro mikes, etc.  Any time a protester throws a stone, is carting a weapon, burns an American flag, etc. spotter calls location and sniper eliminates the agressor.  Wash, rinse and repeat, eventually the unwashed masses would get a hint, if no hint recieved at least we would be eliminating the more agressive of the haters.

The purpose of Embassies is diplomacy, but ...... I'm good widdit!

"Talk nice with us, or else.... ".
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #83 on: September 15, 2012, 09:44:17 AM »
So the storyline is gonna be all the riots were caused by a film......on Islam.....I guess it's as good a scapegoat as anything the libs can glom onto. let's see how they treat that freedom of speech thing.

I thought my views on liberals couldn't get any worse....I was mistaken. Obama shouldn't be able to cobble up enough votes for dog catcher, much less president. I have no time for them. I'm finding it extremely difficult at my business keeping my thoughts to myself. The last few days, what a cluster*uck. And the media, no shame.

I don't need to explain the embarrassment, you guys know.

Yes, the script is written, the usual Muzzie-loving/CodePink/Jew-hating/PaulBots at ZH don't want to see it, they instead cling to their fantasies...now this morning I read a story where the Fed's are interviewing the filmmaker and it is just a coincidence that the probation dept is looking into any possible violations of his parole resulting from financial crimes he was involved in, what violation of parole making a movie can trigger...well, I suppose it is really reaching deep to think it is because the attention the film has generated in the civilized environs of the Muhammadans...about as much of a reach as thinking Obama sympathizes with poor Muzzies the world over...

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_EGYPT_FILMMAKER_PROBATION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-09-15-06-44-20

Next, expect libiot lawmakers to introduce Federal legislation calling for the criminalization of offending Islam, because it is just too costly in lives and property to defend free speech this incendiary no matter what that meddlesome Constitution says!
« Last Edit: September 15, 2012, 09:48:48 AM by Libertas »
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #84 on: September 15, 2012, 09:48:03 AM »
Why not ...

At every embassy station 4 snipers and 8 spotters at stragic, defensable locations on roof tops or at least the highest ground possible.  The 12 would be connected electronically (ear buds, micro mikes, etc.  Any time a protester throws a stone, is carting a weapon, burns an American flag, etc. spotter calls location and sniper eliminates the agressor.  Wash, rinse and repeat, eventually the unwashed masses would get a hint, if no hint recieved at least we would be eliminating the more agressive of the haters.

The purpose of Embassies is diplomacy, but ...... I'm good widdit!

"Talk nice with us, or else.... ".

Never happen.  Not under Duh Muzzie Wuh, not under Cankles...nope, never.

As for me personally?  I'd prefer flamethrowers being deployed.   ;)
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline robins111

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 345
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #85 on: September 15, 2012, 11:31:25 AM »
Why not ...

At every embassy station 4 snipers and 8 spotters at stragic, defensable locations on roof tops or at least the highest ground possible.  The 12 would be connected electronically (ear buds, micro mikes, etc.  Any time a protester throws a stone, is carting a weapon, burns an American flag, etc. spotter calls location and sniper eliminates the agressor.  Wash, rinse and repeat, eventually the unwashed masses would get a hint, if no hint recieved at least we would be eliminating the more agressive of the haters.

Naw, flame throwers would be my suggestion.

Offline benb61

  • Established Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1450
  • My 2 fast cars
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #86 on: September 16, 2012, 01:12:37 AM »
Why not ...

At every embassy station 4 snipers and 8 spotters at stragic, defensable locations on roof tops or at least the highest ground possible.  The 12 would be connected electronically (ear buds, micro mikes, etc.  Any time a protester throws a stone, is carting a weapon, burns an American flag, etc. spotter calls location and sniper eliminates the agressor.  Wash, rinse and repeat, eventually the unwashed masses would get a hint, if no hint recieved at least we would be eliminating the more agressive of the haters.

The purpose of Embassies is diplomacy, but ...... I'm good widdit!

"Talk nice with us, or else.... ".

Never happen.  Not under Duh Muzzie Wuh, not under Cankles...nope, never.

As for me personally?  I'd prefer flamethrowers being deployed.   ;)

Flame throwers just don't have the range.  Though for breaches of the wall, they would work pretty well I think.  As far as the diplomacy comment,  we are just defending American soil form attack (as is our right).

Eschew Obfuscation

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #87 on: September 16, 2012, 01:42:51 AM »

They are all tools, if one is skilled with
a specific tool it is the best tool. Smoke
'em if you got 'em.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #88 on: September 16, 2012, 12:07:28 PM »



There will be blood:
A Libyan man explains that the bloodstains on the column
are from one the American staff members who grabbed
the edge of the column while he was evacuated, after an
attack that killed four Americans on September 11th



Link

Bloody hand prints, stolen documents and shocking security failings: Harrowing pictures inside crumbling U.S. consulate in Benghazi after attacks that left ambassador and three others dead


    Dramatic images of bloody hand prints and crumbling buildings capture horror of Tuesday's attack on U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, which fell on 11th anniversary of 9/11 terrorist attacks
    Sensitive documents have gone missing from compound, including names of Libyans working with Americans
    Libyan officials say four men now in custody in relation to attack
    Landlord of building says there were 400 rioters and attack could not be prevented

By Beth Stebner

PUBLISHED: 19:48 EST, 13 September 2012 | UPDATED: 03:29 EST, 14 September 2012



In the wake of the deadly U.S. consulate attack in Libya’s second-largest city, disturbing images have emerged of the embassy, which is now little more than bloodied rubble that has been looted, torched, and trampled upon.

These images are only part of the story, as it has been revealed today that a major security breach could have been the reason that American Ambassador Christopher Stevens, along with three other Americans, were killed in Tuesday’s attack. ...




Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #89 on: September 16, 2012, 07:13:02 PM »
Why not ...

At every embassy station 4 snipers and 8 spotters at stragic, defensable locations on roof tops or at least the highest ground possible.  The 12 would be connected electronically (ear buds, micro mikes, etc.  Any time a protester throws a stone, is carting a weapon, burns an American flag, etc. spotter calls location and sniper eliminates the agressor.  Wash, rinse and repeat, eventually the unwashed masses would get a hint, if no hint recieved at least we would be eliminating the more agressive of the haters.

The purpose of Embassies is diplomacy, but ...... I'm good widdit!

"Talk nice with us, or else.... ".

Never happen.  Not under Duh Muzzie Wuh, not under Cankles...nope, never.

As for me personally?  I'd prefer flamethrowers being deployed.   ;)

Flame throwers just don't have the range.  Though for breaches of the wall, they would work pretty well I think.  As far as the diplomacy comment,  we are just defending American soil form attack (as is our right).



The kind I am thinking of have great range.  In WWII we had flame-throwing tanks, retrofit an M1 Abrams, they'll be screaming Muzzies on fire likity-split!
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #90 on: September 16, 2012, 07:14:20 PM »
That whore Rice, UN Ambassador right?  What a lying skunk.  We KNOW this was all premeditated!

And the Lybian leader has admitted it!

"The way these perpetrators acted and moved -- I think we, and they're choosing the specific date for this so-called demonstration, I think we have no, this leaves us with no doubt that this was pre-planned, determined," Magariaf said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2012/09/libyan-president-no-doubt-consulate-attack-preplanned-135664.html
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline AlanS

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 7908
  • Proud Infidel
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #91 on: September 16, 2012, 07:49:55 PM »
I'm getting the impression you don't trust this administration. ::hysterical::
"Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem."

Thomas Jefferson

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #92 on: September 16, 2012, 08:50:00 PM »

Looked for pictures of her that couldn't be posted here
not one, not one, she flies under the radar.  Opps, that's
archaic, she's really a stealth bomber, 'eh?

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #93 on: September 17, 2012, 06:55:11 AM »
I'm getting the impression you don't trust this administration. ::hysterical::

I trust them...to lie, to steal, to misinform and distract, and to implement the very worst ideas...all meant to destroy America from the inside out.
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #94 on: September 17, 2012, 06:58:23 AM »

Looked for pictures of her that couldn't be posted here
not one, not one, she flies under the radar.  Opps, that's
archaic, she's really a stealth bomber, 'eh?

It's not just her.  That idiot McCain came out and said the stupidest thing!  He said the attacks were coordinated but then went on to say it is a battle between radical and moderate Muslims...

 ::)   ::gaah::

He should have stopped his sentence half way through, that latter part is pure pc/diversity/multi-culti/RINO/E-GOP/AINO piles of steaming BS!

We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Glock32

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 8747
  • Get some!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #95 on: September 17, 2012, 10:13:52 AM »

It's not just her.  That idiot McCain came out and said the stupidest thing!  He said the attacks were coordinated but then went on to say it is a battle between radical and moderate Muslims...

 ::)   ::gaah::

He should have stopped his sentence half way through, that latter part is pure pc/diversity/multi-culti/RINO/E-GOP/AINO piles of steaming BS!



"The Fourth Estate is less honorable than the First Profession."

- Yours Truly

Offline Weisshaupt

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5739
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #96 on: September 17, 2012, 11:27:40 AM »
No, its because they Hate us. HT imao.us

Quote
The Post-Cognitive Convulsive Reflex Test – Part 1
When Lieutenant Robert Maynard (and crew) killed Blackbeard, Edward Teach, in ferocious hand-to-hand combat, he cut off the famous pirate’s head and hung it from the prow of his ship as proof of his claim on the reward.  Maynard’s crew dumped Blackbeard’s body overboard. No, this is not a Disney movie review – this is one of many ways that good and dangerous men, fighting on the side of the law, properly celebrate victory. Or at least they used to.  Can you think of such a thing being allowed today?
Imagine, if you will, that in the very recent past a Time Lord, a native of Gallifrey, had decided his next adventure would involve becoming a journalist, a war correspondent, either with the BBC (the most likely candidate, given that they own the rights to “Doctor Who”), the American press, or even – God forbid – Reuters. Now imagine further that this near-immortal nomadic correspondent had been abroad, “in country” on assignment in Afghanistan a while back when a few American soldiers, feeling pressure from the buildup of metabolic wastes due to biological and physiological processes common to all mammals everywhere, chose to voluntarily dehydrate in the most psychologically gratifying manner available to them, i.e. upon the bodies of their fallen foes.
Double heart-attack!
Followed hard upon, of course, by a hyperventilating soliloquy and/or a mad scrambling dash for his TARDIS, with the intent to put right this great wrong.  I allow myself this little sci-fi license because out here in Reality ™, the whole “truth is stranger than fiction” cliché has obviously been bulking up, and will likely be caught doping if anyone can figure out how to administer the test.  In the meantime, seriously, I think most Americans have been incredulously wondering why the press were making such a big deal out of dead damp Taliban, all the while actually knowing the answer but reluctant to give it a voice.
I’ll say it; “It’s because they hate us.”
You can get a lot of mileage out of that phrase, by the way, because it is guided by accuracy and powered by honesty.
Say it with me:  “It’s because they hate us.”
Now don’t go all maudlin on me and start trying to figure out WHY they hate us… if you head down that road you’ll soon fall prey to all the guilt-ridden Oikophobes and/or Xenophobes clamoring for your attention. They hate us because they’re envious, or because they’re Life’s most epic losers, or because they hate themselves, are looking for someone to blame, and have no sense of personal responsibility. They hate us because they’ve been taught to hate us. And with both Truth and Life being extravagantly complex things, anyone looking for some sort of grievance will likely find several to choose from, thus moral degenerates of all types justify their hatred to themselves, all while patting themselves on the back for their supposed superiority, their “elite” status, or their belief system which must never be insulted.
Their whole lives train them to hate, and because it is the easiest path, they pass that on to their children. The cycle is a LONG way from being broken.
And speaking of “It’s because they hate us”, I recommend prefacing the phrase with “No,” when using it as a rebuttal.  Feel free to reword as necessary to fit the requisite grammar dictated by the scansion of your reply, so long as you retain the same core message.
Example:
Q:        “Did the angry crowds attack our embassies in Egypt and Yemen, and our consulate in Libya, killing our ambassador and members of his staff because of some anti-Islamic film posted on the Internet?”
A:         “No, they did it because they hate us.”
Pop Quiz:
1.       Q:        Did the 19 9-11 hijackers kill 2,977 people, knock down the World Trade Center, and demolish part of the Pentagon because they disagreed with our policies towards Israel?
A:            ___________________________________

2.       Q:        One thing I’m confused about – that whole “cartoon Mohammed” thing… What’s up with all that, especially given that throughout Islamic history there’s been plenty of artwork depicting him, with nary a squeak?  Why all the sudden histrionics?
A:            ___________________________________

3.          Q:       I’d like to get off the “Islam” angle for a bit because I wanted to ask why the TSA finds it necessary to grope little children and wheelchair-bound grandmothers of obvious Icelandic extraction?
A:            Actually, that’s still tangentially on the “Islamic” topic, but nevertheless the answer to your question is ___________________________________

4.          Q:       Honestly now, did ANYONE in Washington DC really think a 2000-ish page healthcare bill dense with spaghetti-bureaucracy and totalitarian dictates was actually a good idea? I mean, obviously some percentage of the public can always be fooled, but I seriously can’t believe that anyone who had a hand in creating that abomination, despite how they may present themselves to the cameras, says in their hearts “I’m proud of this… I did good work here”, and then go on to strenuously fight in its favor. Why would someone do such a thing?
A:            I hate to break it to you, but a least a few, and possibly more than a few, are easily that deluded. 
But regarding the rest of them, ___________________________________

5.          Q:       Why does the EPA do things like shut off the water to our country’s richest farmland in the name of a bait minnow, or insist on driving coal-powered electricity generators out of business, or hauling into court people who were just trying to build a home on their own property that’s smack in the middle of a neighborhood, and which is at least a block away from any water, by claiming the property is part of a “navigable waterway” and thus under EPA jurisdiction, with little or no hope of appeal?
A:            I think you’re getting the hang of this, but just to nail the point home… ___________________________________

6.       Q:        But isn’t it true that Osama Bin Laden himself said “Terrorism against America deserves to be praised because it was a response to injustice, aimed at forcing America to stop its support for Israel, which kills our people."

A:            It is true that those words actually came out of his mouth, yes, but when that video was made he had already been denying for months that he had been involved. Later, of course, right before the 2004 election, he admitted that he’d directed the attacks. So are you going to believe his stated motivation from a propaganda video when he was simultaneously actively lying about his involvement, or do you finally realize that ___________________________________?

Here’s how to score this quiz:  Award yourself 16 and 2/3rd points for every answer you got correct, and consider yourself excused (and excluded) from polite company if you got any wrong.
What to do about this? Well, the hardest work starts at home, and I have an idea I’d like to propose. I think we should test our citizens, and just for the record I’m excusing all members of our military because I can already predict with 99%+ accuracy what their results would be.
For everyone else; stay tuned for Part 2!

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #97 on: September 17, 2012, 11:36:09 AM »
More Obama-spawned mahem in Pakistan...

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/world/asia/crowds-storm-us-consulate-in-pakistan-and-one-dies.html?_r=0

Heard on the radio too crap going on in Kabul.

I need to find a link for this too, heard Bush only lost 600 in Ashcanistan in 8 years...in less than 4 years Duh Messiuh has lost twice that number.

Only if your foreign policy is failure and defeat does this make sense, and only in the MFM does all of this not get reported...

We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #98 on: September 17, 2012, 12:46:44 PM »

Right, Bush didn't prosecute Afghanistan, he held it and did not allow
it to be a teaching, training, or staging area.  His Emptiness, the Dauphin,
is the one, preceding, during, and after his presidential campaign that
insisted he would take the war where it belonged, Afghanistan.  He did it
he owns it.  That blood is on his hands alone.



charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #99 on: September 17, 2012, 01:45:42 PM »

Indonesia is at it.