Author Topic: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES  (Read 80978 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #160 on: October 07, 2012, 07:32:50 PM »
Yup.  He better hope he loses the election and quietly disppears into the Hawaiian wild, he is burning people that will sink a second term.  And frankly, learning what a completely selfish unprincipled back-stabbing douchebag this guy is and how little he regards this nation is revealing to sya the least.

!
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #161 on: October 10, 2012, 07:45:31 AM »
Obama Regime changes tune on Benghazi attack, wasn't the little known film made by an obscure guy nobody knew about who the Fed's got arrested on a state parole violation after all.  Nothing to see here, move along...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/9/state-department-changes-account-benghazi-attack/?page=all#pagebreak

Yeah, nothing to see/move laong, that's what the Democrat-Media Complex is hoping for in the worst way!  That is why they are excluding FoxNews at White House press events...

 ::cussing::  punk cowards!

For what it's worth, I think the Issa hearings looking into this kick off today...
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #162 on: October 10, 2012, 03:34:32 PM »

Saw Shep go off on some bureaucrat today. 
This is a bipartisan outrage the administration
is trying to put a lid on. 

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-embassy-libya-sought-13000-year-bodyguards-limited-english-gave-preference-citizen

U.S. Embassy in Libya Sought $13,000-Per-Year Bodyguards With ‘Limited’ English; But Gave Preference to Citizen ‘Same-Sex Domestic Partners’ of U.S. Gov’t Employees


Who wants a $13K body guard?  The maid makes $13k a year. 
Oh, wait, she's competent and could acquit herself well with a skillet
and butcher knife.  Criminy.





Offline John Florida

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 10059
  • IT'S MY FONT AND I'LL USE IT IF I WANT TO!!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #163 on: October 10, 2012, 05:15:07 PM »
  From what I saw today it looks like the state dept.threw the WH under the bus. The coverup is no longer covered up and nobody in state is going to the slammer for the WH.
All men are created equal"
 Filippo Mazzie

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #164 on: October 10, 2012, 06:15:13 PM »
But Gave Preference to Citizen ‘Same-Sex Domestic Partners’ of U.S. Gov’t Employees...

Huh, what?!  This is Benghazi right, not San Francisco?

State still has issues...this idiocy come from Hildabeast, eh?  More unwanted Eleanor Roosevelt traits surfacing...

 ::asskicking::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19533
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #166 on: October 11, 2012, 06:08:53 PM »
More spontaneous eruptions, what, no video from the vile West this time?!  Gotta be a mistake!


Yeah, the mistake is treating these animals like rational people!!!
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #167 on: October 11, 2012, 06:13:19 PM »
Oh, and did you see this Cutter twit spout off about Romney/Ryan being the cause of all these useless and unnecessary debate over the Benghazi fustercluck?

"In terms of the politicization of this — you know, we are here at a debate, and I hope we get to talk about the debate — but the entire reason this has become the political topic it is, is because of Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan. It’s a big part of their stump speech. And it’s reckless and irresponsible what they’re doing."
http://freebeacon.com/cutter-benghazi-is-only-an-issue-because-of-romney-and-ryan/

Eff you Steph!  When I want bullsh*t out of a political hack with no sense and zero credibility I'll ask for it!  If not for people getting to the real facts your bullsh*t Regime would not have been forced to backtrack on the ridiculous spontaneous protest gone wrong because of an evil Western filmmaker nobody knew anything about you useless political turd!

 ::doublebird::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline LadyVirginia

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5168
  • Mt. Vernon painting by Francis Jukes
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #168 on: October 11, 2012, 10:08:21 PM »
In the debate tonight Martha and Biden tried to make it an issue that Romney offered an opinion about the attack.  My family looked at each other and asked how it that relevant to the administration's failure to act?
"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #169 on: October 12, 2012, 06:45:57 AM »
Yes, a Republican cannot comment on current events, very bad form, however when Obama commented on everything under the sun re: Bush in going against McCainiac that was ll just principled policy differences donthchyaknow?!

Morons.  I would have loved to see Ryan reach over with both hands and grab those two empty skulls and bang 'em together...I bet the echo would be defeaning.
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #170 on: October 12, 2012, 07:14:56 AM »
Wow, look at what Romney said about the retarded comments by the libiot Cutter and compare that to the utterly weak gobbledegook knee-jerk childish lashing out offered by O'Bongo!

http://www.breitbart.com/system/wire/CNG---0f2713668f2bbbb0b8aa5e938d9485bc---2f1

And these libiots think O'Bongo looks for Presidential and capable of effective leadership than Romney?   ::speechless::  They are completely insane!

But keep talking trash, yeah really, I think you can scare a few more voters away!   ::hysterical::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #171 on: October 12, 2012, 11:04:45 AM »

"I think today we got another indication of how President Obama and his campaign fail to grasp the seriousness of the challenges that we face here in America,"

"No, President Obama, it's an issue because this is the first time in thirty-three years that a United States Ambassador has been assassinated.

"Mr President, this is an issue because we were attacked successfully by terrorists on the anniversary of 9/11.

"President Obama, this is an issue because Americans wonder why it was it took so long for you and your administration to admit that this was a terrorist attack," Romney said, demanding "serious answers" for the American people.

And linking off Hawk's link:  "Mrs Romney, who looks, dare we say, almost too flawless in her portrait, reveals that Mitt has struggled with a short temper in the past."

He can throw heat, good.



Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #172 on: October 12, 2012, 11:27:09 AM »
This Regime is criminally and intentionally negligent, corrupt and misguided.  We predicted this Libyan thing would so sideways, it did, they lied and people died, and they tried to lie some more and they are pissed that anybody, especially a fricken Republican, would call them out on it.  Once more we see who is wearing the Depends and who isn't.

And this Syrian thing and putting troops in Jordan is probably going to be way worse than this fiasco!  We just cannot leave the fate of the nation in the hands of these stupid little brats!

 ::asskicking::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #173 on: October 12, 2012, 01:00:29 PM »

Normal people do not consider American civilians on American soil dieing
from an al qaeda attack "bumps in the road".  The whole world is watching
and every cogent person in the USA is realizing what a leader he is. 

This statement does exclude "the 33%" and other related neurotics and psychotics.


Offline Pandora

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 19533
  • I iz also makin a list. U on it pal.
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #175 on: October 15, 2012, 12:30:22 PM »
http://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-live/2012/10/issa-state-dept-sitting-on-billionplus-for-embassy-138402.html?hp=r2_b3

"Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) says the State Department is sitting on $2.2 billion that should be spent on upgrading security at U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide, but the Obama administration will not spend the funds.Issa claims the State Department will not spend the already approved funds because they didn't want to the appearance of needing increased security.

... "The fact is, they [the State Department.] are making the decision not to put the security in because they don't want the presence of security," Issa said. "That is not how you do security."

With Republicans turning the Libya into a political issue, Democrats have countered that House GOP leaders actually sought to cut funding for embassy security, which Issa tried to refute.

"You can't always look to [new] money when there's money sitting there," Issa said."
"Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer." - Mark Twain

"Let us assume for the moment everything you say about me is true. That just makes your problem bigger, doesn't it?"

Offline Predator Don

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 4576
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #176 on: October 15, 2012, 01:59:15 PM »
How many more lies will it take before this election becomes a blowout. The blood of those killed are on thier hands.
I'm not always engulfed in scandals, but when I am, I make sure I blame others.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #177 on: October 15, 2012, 03:57:38 PM »

The election is a blowout.  The question is; how many more lies will
it take before they go after him with subpoenas and warrants.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #178 on: October 15, 2012, 05:57:45 PM »
Explains why Hildabeast hauled ass to Peru, eh?!

And yes, the election is shaping up to be a blow out, but that is what worries me, these power-mad morons don't give up easily and the rules as we all know do not apply to them.  Makes me wonder what illegalities are up their dirty sleeves!

 ::foilhathelicopter::
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

charlesoakwood

  • Guest
Re: U.S. Embassies under attack -- UPDATES
« Reply #179 on: October 15, 2012, 06:45:06 PM »

I hope they understand that they are not slick enough to pull it off.
They may be able to read the polls but they are not reading the people.
We don't need polls.