Author Topic: TV's Fabulous Sluts  (Read 7562 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline trapeze

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6367
  • Hippies smell bad. Go away, hippie.
TV's Fabulous Sluts
« on: August 07, 2013, 06:02:32 AM »
Okay, I stole the thread title from a Harvard Lampoon publication, the "People Parody" which is a great fake "People" magazine from the early 1980's. I bought an original copy when it first came out because it was hilarious and also because it was so well done that very few of the target audience of the real mag could tell the difference. I would leave it out on a coffee table and watch what would happen when a guest would pick it up and flip through the pages. If you've never seen it, well, it's worth getting a copy if you can find it (check eBay).


Getting back to the subject at hand...

I guess that someone besides myself has noticed that the Disney Channel is a virtual slut factory. Not a little bit surprising is that this someone isn't in the conservative media, this comes out of "LA Weekly" from about a month and a half ago and that is a bit stunning and sort of newsworthy in and of itself. Here is a quote from the article...

Quote
Disney Channel and Teen Nick preach the merits of being a brat by creating fictional worlds in which kids operate without -- or without any regard for -- adult supervision. Embracing the example set by the otherwise more wholesome granddaddy of the genre, Saved by the Bell, grown-ups are either altogether missing in these shows or, in the case of Wizards of Waverly Place and Good Luck Charlie (and the superior, now-canceled, iCarly), infantile sidekicks with no legitimate influence on their mischievous charges. When adults are around, they're depicted as buffoons, and their threats of punishment are toothless, mere narrative devices designed to provide drama while also underscoring the kids' awesome and lionized do-what-I-wanna-do behavior.

Wizards, for example, pivots itself around the har-har disobedience of Selena Gomez's hottie, regardless of any problems it causes or parental castigations it engenders. Still, that's preferable to Jesse, How to Rock, Victorious, Austin & Ally and Shake It Up (and even boy-band dreck Big Time Rush), where the general absence of mother and father figures -- the kids live more or less on their own, in lavish houses or apartments, without having jobs or any notable sources of income -- conveys the idea that, with a lot of self-satisfied smirking and pratfalling ingenuity, teens can accomplish everything and anything they want, by themselves, because they always know best.

Britney Spears and Lindsey Lohan are only the two most visible and most infamous graduates of the Disney slut factory. Miley Cyrus warrants mention, as well. The article indicts Nickelodeon, too, which is well deserved.

I noticed this trend of kid targeted television, that of making children appear to be hip and intelligent while simultaneously making adults/parents look moronic, many years ago. I saw it first on the animated fare offered by Nickelodeon, specifically "The Fairly Oddparents" and "Jimmy Neutron" franchises. These shows (and the channel) were ultimately banned in our household and both of our children have been infinitely the better for it.

I don't know what happens at these channels (or to be more precise, at these productions companies) but it must go something like this: They hold auditions, identify talented youngsters, somehow manage to separate them from their parents and then proceed to corrupt them on every level imaginable. Now, there's nothing new about this strategy. H'wood has been trying it for years and there are many horror stories of child actors of years gone by that detail abuse by H'wood pedophiles and other various child exploitation artists too numerous (and infamous) to go into.

Disney and, to a lesser degree, Nickelodeon, have somehow either perfected this technique or today's parents of aspiring actors/actresses are less protective and more willing to be bought off/bribed and corruptible themselves. Then they broadcast this utter garbage as pre-teen entertainment and without responsible parental intervention it is pumped directly into the minds of impressionable and naive children. The societal results speak for themselves.

I loathe people who do this to children. I would no sooner leave my thirteen-year-old daughter alone with one of them than I would a pedophile or rapist. And yeah, that especially includes leaving them to watch this type of television programming.

(Full disclosure: I did once, in spite of my better judgement, allow my daughter (who begged and pleaded) to see the "Hannah Montana Movie." I went with her to see it and then afterwards I forced her to discuss with me all of the wrong things she had witnessed in the movie and why they were wrong. It was a painful and yet extremely necessary exercise.)
____

Side note: The most famous work of The Harvard Lampoon is "Bored of the Rings" which, if you are a LOTR fan and have never read the parody, is an absolute must read. It has the distinction of being the only parody book to be continuously in print since its debut back in 1969. It's that good.
In a doomsday scenario, hippies will be among the first casualties. So not everything about doomsday will be bad.

Offline Libertas

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 67914
  • Alea iacta est! Libertatem aut mori!
Re: TV's Fabulous Sluts
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2013, 06:41:42 AM »
The shorter list - Who's not a TV slut.
We are now where The Founders were when they faced despotism.

Online IronDioPriest

  • Administrator
  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 10856
  • I refuse to accept my civil servants as my rulers
Re: TV's Fabulous Sluts
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2013, 08:09:40 AM »
I am on board with that critique. Youngsters living life without parents present or involved is definitely a theme on several of these shows. So is adults acting like buffoons.

Now, I'll say that having an 8 year old in the house, a good deal of the time our TV is on is tuned to Nick or Disney, and I am quite first-hand familiar with a few shows my lil one likes to watch. iCarly, Good Luck Charlie, Victorious, Jessie, and Shake It Up are a few that she watches pretty regularly, and my wife and I watch them with her. I have to say, after watching umpteen episodes of each myself, I have found zero things to object to. Not only that, but I find these programs entertaining myself.

Brats? None of the main characters are brats. A couple of the sidekicks could be categorized as brats. But the main characters are all good girls.

From my perspective, these shows are for the most part wholesome, fun, innocent, wacky, well-written, and completely benign. Not only that, each episode usually teaches a lesson. And so far, none of the girls on any of these particular shows has melted down with drugs or slut pop-stardom in real life a la Miley Cyrus, Lindsey Lohan, Britney Spears, etc. History would suggest we just need to give them time, but so far...

As I said, I have noted the general absence of adults though. If that aspect has a detrimental impact, it is underlying, and I don't discount that concern. But on the surface, these shows are no more subversive than Gilligan's Island. They were all adult buffoons acting in the absence of children.

« Last Edit: August 07, 2013, 08:42:04 AM by IronDioPriest »
"A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law, would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means."

- Thomas Jefferson

Offline LadyVirginia

  • Conservative Superhero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5168
  • Mt. Vernon painting by Francis Jukes
Re: TV's Fabulous Sluts
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2013, 11:52:45 AM »
Disney certainly has the formula down.  Create a star, merchandise him or her, then cancel the show and begin again.  I have allowed some of their shows in my house but not all. I do not buy the merchandise.  I have made fun of the shows' lack of parental presence so often that my kids got the message.

For many things my kids will encounter I have explained to them that even if something isn't immoral/illegal you still need to ask yourself "Is this how want to spend my time?" 
 
"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."

Offline pisskop

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 243
  • Bump me, America!
Re: TV's Fabulous Sluts
« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2013, 07:28:11 PM »
Quote
I noticed this trend of kid targeted television, that of making children appear to be hip and intelligent while simultaneously making adults/parents look moronic, many years ago. I saw it first on the animated fare offered by Nickelodeon, specifically "The Fairly Oddparents" and "Jimmy Neutron" franchises. These shows (and the channel) were ultimately banned in our household and both of our children have been infinitely the better for it.

Its more than that, I think.  Fathers are usually moronic in a fashion that far exceeds reason, corporations and large establishments are irrevocably evil, and the consequences of failure and poor planning are minimalized to a quick fix.
[MANNERISM_THREAD:lurk]

Today's ??? (_01OCT13_):

 
Quote from: midcan5;1330627
'Conservative' in America has come to be taken over by 'power.'