Topic: Freedom of Religion? Yeah, right!

[Libertas]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/02/washington-grandmother-set-to-lose-home-lifes-savings-for-not-selling-flowers-for-gay-wedding/

Faggots throw hissy-fit, sue grandmothers business for not servicing deviant marriage ceremony, which violates the religious freedom and beliefs of the business owning grandmother, and a faggot-pimping state judge in Washington agrees, and goes so far to say that they can sue her personally for damages, not her business (which would be bad enough and wrong as Hell), but her personally!

How much more of this state sponsored terrorism are people going to take before these tyrants start dangling from streetlights?   

[warpmine]

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/02/washington-grandmother-set-to-lose-home-lifes-savings-for-not-selling-flowers-for-gay-wedding/

Faggots throw hissy-fit, sue grandmothers business for not servicing deviant marriage ceremony, which violates the religious freedom and beliefs of the business owning grandmother, and a faggot-pimping state judge in Washington agrees, and goes so far to say that they can sue her personally for damages, not her business (which would be bad enough and wrong as Hell), but her personally!

How much more of this state sponsored terrorism are people going to take before these tyrants start dangling from streetlights?   

It's not as though the Washington State's law is violating the woman's 1st amendment rights err wait, sorry, that's exactly what's happening. Where the f**k is the ACLU on this? Oh, never mind, I forgot, silly me, the ACLU is a front group for the f**king communists.

Then there's the due process violation of the 4th Amendment to strip her of her property. The lawsuit against this totalitarian edict and that's exactly what it is should have been at the desks of the SCOTUS the same day the ruling came down.

As we sit idly by to await another ridiculously obvious violation to be adjudicated by the progtards, they become that much more emboldened to go yet another step farther. The shooting should have begun years ago, what the f**k is taking so long? Must I do it myself?

[Libertas]

Exactly!  It is infuriating and frustrating to see such wanton violations not to be met with righteous defiance and resolute disobedience. 

[Predator Don]

I don't know the circumstances of this event......but it wouldn't be an event if the homo kept its lifestyle to itself........ But we know that ain't gonna happen.....so......Personally, I would take their money, it is not condoning a lifestyle to take homo money. You live and work in the world, just don't be a partaker of the world. I would charge more, just as I would to any aggravating, difficult customer.

I've done it before.......don't want the customer? Then price your job to do one of two things: 1) they go somewhere else because of your cost 2) you get paid for the difficulty. For me, it would not be a compromise of my principles. It's just business.

[Libertas]

I don't know the circumstances of this event......but it wouldn't be an event if the homo kept its lifestyle to itself........ But we know that ain't gonna happen.....so......Personally, I would take their money, it is not condoning a lifestyle to take homo money. You live and work in the world, just don't be a partaker of the world. I would charge more, just as I would to any aggravating, difficult customer.

I've done it before.......don't want the customer? Then price your job to do one of two things: 1) they go somewhere else because of your cost 2) you get paid for the difficulty. For me, it would not be a compromise of my principles. It's just business.

I understand that sentiment and strategy...but it is not going to guarantee they won't sue you for discrimination on that basis either...I mean are there not laws on the books now to prevent such things for certain necessary goods and services?  You can play at the margins, but only so much.  And we all know, the way things are going, everything will be mandated and price-controlled...but by then the underground market will be well established anyway...

Soon, the choices we all face will be more than mildly annoying...if anybody thinks the lack of pushback is going to stop the libiot march to fulll-blown fascism, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell to them for a song.

[Predator Don]

I don't know the circumstances of this event......but it wouldn't be an event if the homo kept its lifestyle to itself........ But we know that ain't gonna happen.....so......Personally, I would take their money, it is not condoning a lifestyle to take homo money. You live and work in the world, just don't be a partaker of the world. I would charge more, just as I would to any aggravating, difficult customer.

I've done it before.......don't want the customer? Then price your job to do one of two things: 1) they go somewhere else because of your cost 2) you get paid for the difficulty. For me, it would not be a compromise of my principles. It's just business.

I understand that sentiment and strategy...but it is not going to guarantee they won't sue you for discrimination on that basis either...I mean are there not laws on the books now to prevent such things for certain necessary goods and services?  You can play at the margins, but only so much.  And we all know, the way things are going, everything will be mandated and price-controlled...but by then the underground market will be well established anyway...

Soon, the choices we all face will be more than mildly annoying...if anybody thinks the lack of pushback is going to stop the libiot march to fulll-blown fascism, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell to them for a song.

Oh I think there would be plenty of opportunity to push back, to have conversation...in this instance....I would take their money pushing back, though, because there IS no guarantee you still won't face a lawsuit. Like I stated, it's getting paid for the aggravation factor.

[Libertas]

I don't know the circumstances of this event......but it wouldn't be an event if the homo kept its lifestyle to itself........ But we know that ain't gonna happen.....so......Personally, I would take their money, it is not condoning a lifestyle to take homo money. You live and work in the world, just don't be a partaker of the world. I would charge more, just as I would to any aggravating, difficult customer.

I've done it before.......don't want the customer? Then price your job to do one of two things: 1) they go somewhere else because of your cost 2) you get paid for the difficulty. For me, it would not be a compromise of my principles. It's just business.

I understand that sentiment and strategy...but it is not going to guarantee they won't sue you for discrimination on that basis either...I mean are there not laws on the books now to prevent such things for certain necessary goods and services?  You can play at the margins, but only so much.  And we all know, the way things are going, everything will be mandated and price-controlled...but by then the underground market will be well established anyway...

Soon, the choices we all face will be more than mildly annoying...if anybody thinks the lack of pushback is going to stop the libiot march to fulll-blown fascism, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell to them for a song.

Oh I think there would be plenty of opportunity to push back, to have conversation...in this instance....I would take their money pushing back, though, because there IS no guarantee you still won't face a lawsuit. Like I stated, it's getting paid for the aggravation factor.

Libiot premiums, I'm all for them...I encourage my BIL to put a hefty premium on all libiots...

Something to do in the meantime, not a long term solution to the problem...but...it is what it is...

[Predator Don]

I don't know the circumstances of this event......but it wouldn't be an event if the homo kept its lifestyle to itself........ But we know that ain't gonna happen.....so......Personally, I would take their money, it is not condoning a lifestyle to take homo money. You live and work in the world, just don't be a partaker of the world. I would charge more, just as I would to any aggravating, difficult customer.

I've done it before.......don't want the customer? Then price your job to do one of two things: 1) they go somewhere else because of your cost 2) you get paid for the difficulty. For me, it would not be a compromise of my principles. It's just business.

I understand that sentiment and strategy...but it is not going to guarantee they won't sue you for discrimination on that basis either...I mean are there not laws on the books now to prevent such things for certain necessary goods and services?  You can play at the margins, but only so much.  And we all know, the way things are going, everything will be mandated and price-controlled...but by then the underground market will be well established anyway...

Soon, the choices we all face will be more than mildly annoying...if anybody thinks the lack of pushback is going to stop the libiot march to fulll-blown fascism, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell to them for a song.

Oh I think there would be plenty of opportunity to push back, to have conversation...in this instance....I would take their money pushing back, though, because there IS no guarantee you still won't face a lawsuit. Like I stated, it's getting paid for the aggravation factor.

Libiot premiums, I'm all for them...I encourage my BIL to put a hefty premium on all libiots...

Something to do in the meantime, not a long term solution to the problem...but...it is what it is...

Especially in a business where cost can be subjective. I would have a premium.

[Libertas]

I don't know the circumstances of this event......but it wouldn't be an event if the homo kept its lifestyle to itself........ But we know that ain't gonna happen.....so......Personally, I would take their money, it is not condoning a lifestyle to take homo money. You live and work in the world, just don't be a partaker of the world. I would charge more, just as I would to any aggravating, difficult customer.

I've done it before.......don't want the customer? Then price your job to do one of two things: 1) they go somewhere else because of your cost 2) you get paid for the difficulty. For me, it would not be a compromise of my principles. It's just business.

I understand that sentiment and strategy...but it is not going to guarantee they won't sue you for discrimination on that basis either...I mean are there not laws on the books now to prevent such things for certain necessary goods and services?  You can play at the margins, but only so much.  And we all know, the way things are going, everything will be mandated and price-controlled...but by then the underground market will be well established anyway...

Soon, the choices we all face will be more than mildly annoying...if anybody thinks the lack of pushback is going to stop the libiot march to fulll-blown fascism, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I can sell to them for a song.

Oh I think there would be plenty of opportunity to push back, to have conversation...in this instance....I would take their money pushing back, though, because there IS no guarantee you still won't face a lawsuit. Like I stated, it's getting paid for the aggravation factor.

Libiot premiums, I'm all for them...I encourage my BIL to put a hefty premium on all libiots...

Something to do in the meantime, not a long term solution to the problem...but...it is what it is...

Especially in a business where cost can be subjective. I would have a premium.

In contractor work like my BIL's business you can only go so far, or lose the project bid, but in the case of those moonbat inner-city prevailing union wage areas...I urge him to bid them high and bend them over hard!

In others, there can be contract add-on's the customer insists upon, in those cases you have them over a barrel...call it a fuel surcharge or whatever, a PITA fee is what it is, usually 3 x's cost of labor and materials!