In short, no SAARS virus ever had a furin cleavage site. Experts thought if one did, it would become much more transmissible. Then a research proposal for U of NC and Wuhan lab proposed adding a furin cleavage site to a SAARS virus. The COVID virus had exactly that. The CIA may have bribed their own experts to change their opinions on the source of the COVID virus.
Longer version
Sachs was involved in some examination of COVID. He sums up some stuff better than I have heard before. Damning.
1. SAARS killed a lot but not super transmittable.
2. No SAARS virus ever had a furin cleavage site.
3. If present, it would make it much more infectious. This was known in 2005.
4. In 2021, a whistleblower posted a research proposal on line. From U of NC and Wuhan lab. Search the Wuhan collection and search for furin cleavage site. If none found, then insert a furin cleavage site and see if that made it more transmissible.
Given a list of base pairs, can create a live virus based on that. Infect cells, harvest viruses, see how they did.
NAIAD, NIH knew about it.
16 min First investigators first looked at the site and were shocked. Alarmed.
CIA looked into it. Public never saw the study. Summary. CIA leaned toward natural release vs others who said lab.
then a couple weeks ago, a whistleblower came forward. DEM senate blocked study, not GOP House. Whistleblower said the CIA lied. Said CIA experts voted 6 to 1 for lab leak. CIA bribed its own experts to say natural virus.
21 min. the DIA warned about CIA lying and bribing.
Sachs said 80% of world view Ukr as proxy war between US and RU using Ukr. Ze and Biden speeches made no headway at UN.
https://youtu.be/nyqoBiq7cz8?t=473Origin of Covid & Whistleblowing w/Jeffrey Sachs
Judge Napolitano
