Might have to adjust this thread title..."One-China" policy might not be dead...it might be back-channel operative...
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/biden-approves-his-first-taiwan-arms-package-sale-ratcheting-china-tensions-furtherThis appears deceptive and underwhelming to me. If the Chi-Com's come for Taiwan they'll use airpower first...soften it with missiles and bombs, take out command/control...target airbases (2 are underground requiring bunker-busters), fixed SAM/SAS sites and sub pens, ports, railways, bridges, fuel depots, etc...probably quickly followed by insertion of paramilitary forces mostly by air at night and inserted from sea by sub...then air-cover for the amphibious invasion. Well, the latter only if they care to salvage the island somewhat intact...
So, mobile self-propelled Howitzer's make some sense...but not nearly enough if repelling a full-scale invasion is the goal.
https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison-detail.php?country1=taiwan&country2=chinahttps://armedforces.eu/compare/country_China_vs_Taiwanhttps://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/taiwan/weapons.htmTaiwan has a small Navy, no attack aircraft, no drones...no nukes. They have missiles - surface to air, air to air, air to surface and surface to surface but numbers are not disclosed. Their main strategy is naturally asymmetric and designed around area denial - aka holding off an invasion. Not knowing the number or capability of missile inventory they likely need more, the Reds have them outnumbered in most everything that can be thrown at them. What would make what is coming after them less potent is hitting them at their bases before they sortie...which would require powerful conventionally armed ballistic missiles, now that would get their attention in a big way.
So to me Beijing Biden is playing smoke and mirror here, snookering American's he is serious about the threat to Taiwan while providing token support to Taiwan who remains existentially vulnerable to a ravenous totalitarian bully.