Author Topic: The Trayvon Martin/Zimmerman Trial Thread (Read 40665 times)

Glock32 · « **Reply #280 on:** July 19, 2013, 03:00:33 PM »

Another thing I can't help but notice whenever he makes these types of speeches, is just how vapid and banal he is. It's sort of like when he was in Israel and gave a speech that was basically "Israelis and Palestinians just need to get to know one another" or some such trite inanity. Then in Ireland, he made some similarly boneheaded cliche generalization about religious schooling.

This is the guy who is supposed to be the most worldy and sophisticated intellect to ever sit in the Oval Office. If he were anyone else, the media would be in nonstop guffaws over his bumper sticker reductionist views.

robins111 · « **Reply #281 on:** July 19, 2013, 04:26:42 PM »

I will tell you this.. In my opinion.. That tard you have in the white house is
trying.to stir up race riots.. You guys. Keep your powder dry..

Glock32 · « **Reply #282 on:** July 19, 2013, 04:58:48 PM »

Quote from: robins111 on July 19, 2013, 04:26:42 PM

I will tell you this.. In my opinion.. That tard you have in the white house is
trying.to stir up race riots.. You guys. Keep your powder dry..

No doubt about that. That's been his mission since taking office, and certainly was the framework for the whole Zimmerman case. From a strictly political standpoint, he's also using this case as a fulcrum to shove gun control back into the public conversation. They've been diligently working to conflate the two, making gun ownership and self-defense into automatically racist activities.

How many times just in the past year have we had to beat back the gun control attempts? And yet, they're always right back trying to slither out of the box as soon as they get the slightest bit of daylight seeping through. The morons in the GOP could have learned a thing or two from their nominal opponents, and that is to be relentless.

Notice, though, how there's no such thing as "settled law" until the Left's interpretation has prevailed? At that point there's no further debate or revision, it is cast in stone.

Alphabet Soup · « **Reply #283 on:** July 19, 2013, 10:33:48 PM »

Quote

BTW, did Obongo just admit he was a thug 35 years ago?

Why, yes he did!

The hilarious thing is that, like that silent dog-whistle thingy that the left is always accusing us of using, it would appear that blue-lips is the only one on the planet that is oblivious to his own words. Of course it wouldn't be racist for him to (say) be wearing dirty underpants on his head but it would be racist for us to to point it out.

IDC - I'm a racist, you're a racist, he's a racist, she's a racist, wouldn't you like to be a racist too? LOL

LadyVirginia · « **Reply #284 on:** July 19, 2013, 10:34:47 PM »

Pan linked to this blog in another post and I kept reading and found this:

Quote

There’s one industry built around controversy, another built around racism, and a whole lot of people who like to inflict suffering (or enjoy it from a distance). Together they chose Zimmerman. Crowds (presumably in the thrall of a good old fashioned mob mentality) screamed that Zimmerman should be punished. They were livid because he survived. I know this because if he had died, none of us would have heard about it. I have proof. I looked it up and 43 people were murdered in Sanford Florida in a decade. (2002-2011 source.)

So lets ponder the 43 deaths that weren’t Trevon Martin. Go ahead, name one. No takers?

The witch burners don’t care about the other 43 deaths… only one. Only one because the would be victim had the temerity to live another day. Every death is a tragedy. Every murder is a loss. So let’s read the heated rhetoric around the other 43 documented muders. Let’s recall the riots. Let’s read what the president had to say about those poor tragic souls. Let’s read the CNN interviews. Lets wallow in the theorizing and the arguments and the opinions and the many events that followed those 43 horrible deaths. What does the world have to say about the 43 others?

Nothing.

http://adaptivecurmudgeon.wordpress.com/2013/07/16/overreach-and-sammy-hagar-witch-burners-and-george-zimmerman/

RickZ · « **Reply #285 on:** July 20, 2013, 07:22:54 AM »

RickZ · « **Reply #286 on:** July 20, 2013, 07:26:55 AM »

AFTERBURNER w/ BILL WHITTLE: The Lynching

John Florida · « **Reply #287 on:** July 20, 2013, 10:07:00 AM »

If he was travon 35 years ago we would not be in the mess were in.

robins111 · « **Reply #288 on:** July 20, 2013, 01:44:14 PM »

Snicker, giggle, snort.. there was a 'justice for trayvon' demonstration at the US Consulate today in Toronto.. They had a massive crowd of one (1) attending the event..

warpmine · « **Reply #289 on:** July 20, 2013, 02:03:18 PM »

Quote from: robins111 on July 20, 2013, 01:44:14 PM

Snicker, giggle, snort.. there was a 'justice for trayvon' demonstration at the US Consulate today in Toronto.. They had a massive crowd of one (1) attending the event..

Seems Canadians are more informed than idiots in this country.

trapeze · « **Reply #290 on:** July 21, 2013, 02:01:43 AM »

Quote from: RickZ on July 20, 2013, 07:26:55 AM

AFTERBURNER w/ BILL WHITTLE: The Lynching

I watched this today and was surprised that there was yet another thing that I did not know about the story...that being that Skittles and watermelon flavored Arizona Ice Tea were 2/3rds of the ingredients for a drug concoction called "lean" and that TM had posted about making/taking it on his Facebook page, that he had liver damage consistent with abuse and that it can cause violent/paranoid reactions.

Overall a great takedown of the media and the political types involved in the persecution of GZ. Typical Whittle.

RickZ · « **Reply #291 on:** July 21, 2013, 03:44:34 AM »

trap,

The Purple Drank, or Purple Lean, is a drug cocktail popular in the hip-hop subculture. That part of the story was out there, but went unreported by the media due to their framing the 'victim' as St. Trayvon of the Skittles. Amazing how they made much hay of the Skittles and watermelon drink that he bought (look how innocent a kid he was!), but the media never explained why he bought it. More media lies by omission, which are more insidious than the lies of commission.

Trayvon is another fine example of the black 'community' lifting thuggishness into acceptability. By withholding the drink information, Zimmerman's 'profiling' makes more sense. What does Zimmerman say, 'He looks like he's on drugs or something'? Well guess what? He was on drugs. But if Trayvon was a drug addled thug hell bent on teaching whitey a lesson with his fists, then Zimmerman's profiling was correct and the race baiters have no case.

What I find obnoxious is the race hustlers all ignore this part of the story, ignore the violent nature of Trayvon which he was proud to show in postings on social media, attempting to force the rest of us to kowtow to such thugs. For if we fight back, we are racist. (Now you see why the prosecution fought like hell to keep the victim's 'lifestyle' out of the court, why they wanted suppressed his cell phone photos. The judge saying somebody else might have used his phone so that evidence could not be admitted was so lame that it showed one more piece of evidence to bias by the judge.)

I find the black faux selective outrage old. If Trayvon was a saint, why was he suspended three times from high school, once for possessing stolen property in his school locker? He was on suspension when he was killed. His father didn't know where he was (dead) for a day. Yet Trayvon is the victim. Well, in a way Trayvon is the victim, just not of who and what the race hustlers want us to believe.

trapeze · « **Reply #292 on:** July 21, 2013, 03:55:16 AM »

I never doubted that he was a doper. I just had no idea as to the tea/skittles connection.

BigAlSouth · « **Reply #293 on:** July 21, 2013, 05:55:30 AM »

Quote from: RickZ on July 21, 2013, 03:44:34 AM

. . .
What I find obnoxious is the race hustlers all ignore this part of the story, ignore the violent nature of Trayvon which he was proud to show in postings on social media, attempting to force the rest of us to kowtow to such thugs. For if we fight back, we are racist. (Now you see why the prosecution fought like hell to keep the victim's 'lifestyle' out of the court, why they wanted suppressed his cell phone photos. The judge saying somebody else might have used his phone so that evidence could not be admitted was so lame that it showed one more piece of evidence to bias by the judge.)

The judge could have admitted the evidence on the cellphone with an instruction to the jury regarding it's "probative value." In other words, she could have let the State make the argument that the phone could have been used by someone else, although found in TM's possession. The judicial standard is "whether the probative value of the evidence is outweighed by the potential for prejudice." Most of the time, this standard is applied to the Defendant, and not a witness. Therefore, the phone evidence should have been admitted IMHO. On review by an appellate court, the discretion of the trial judge is always allowed unless the ruling was a clear abuse of that discretion. Again, looking at the Florida Court of Appeals, they would probably go with Judge Nelson. This being said, in a civil trial, all bets are off and the cell phone info is going to get admitted. (Want a civil trial Attorney Crump? Bring it!)

Quote

I find the black faux selective outrage old. If Trayvon was a saint, why was he suspended three times from high school, once for possessing stolen property in his school locker? He was on suspension when he was killed. His father didn't know where he was (dead) for a day. Yet Trayvon is the victim. Well, in a way Trayvon is the victim, just not of who and what the race hustlers want us to believe.

Somebody needs to have a chat with the school bus driver that Trayvon punched in the nose because TM felt dissed. Was he white, black or hispanic? This could be the Trump Card that O'Mara is holding in the event of a civil trial. If the cellphone data was not admissible, Mark O'Mara probably bet the the bus driver's testimony would be kept out.

Personally, I would welcome a Federal Civil Rights Trial and a State Tort Trial for Wrongful Death. If the country is ready to have a discussion about race, this is a perfect forum.

BigAlSouth · « **Reply #294 on:** July 21, 2013, 06:02:53 AM »

St. Tray's daddy refuses to answer question about son assaulting a TEACHER. By the time this is over, his sainthood could be revoked:

Quote

Martin was asked if one of the real reason Trayvon Martin was suspended from his school in Miami was due to “an altercation” he alleged to have had with one of his school teachers. Mr. Martin answered that “he could not confirm that” and he had “no knowledge” of the purported incident. Martin added that “we all knew he was suspended from school” and that it was his decision to take him up to Orlando. When asked if he thought it just a rumor that his son Trayvon had “an altercation” with his teacher, Martin said that “it wasn’t anything like he had an issue with his teacher.” Shortly after Trayvon Martin is shot and killed by George Zimmerman, talk within some circles of the Miami-Dade educational system was that Trayvon had been suspended for assaulting a teacher at his high school, and that teacher, for fear of losing his or her job, chose to stay quiet about the assault, possibly pressured by school police and administrators to do so. - See more at: http://shark-tank.net/2013/07/20/trayvon-martin-alledged-to-have-assaulted-his-teacher/#sthash.m9q5aRW8.dpuf

Read more at: http://shark-tank.net/2013/07/20/trayvon-martin-alledged-to-have-assaulted-his-teacher/ | The Shark Tank

RickZ · « **Reply #295 on:** July 21, 2013, 08:03:00 AM »