You've hit upon something my friend, the communist controlled media is the problem as they are the gate keepers of the information. The best way to kill their power will be to make them useless and for that you need infrastructure failure a.k.a. electrical grid damage. No electricity, no TV....no TV no ability to disseminate the lies. But what about the print media? They'll die as well, because you won't be able to push information through wire services asn they'll be damaged as well. Three decades of darkness and they(population) might be able to see once again.
I think print media is dying because of it's untimely irrelevance. Back in the Dark Ages when I was in college (and disco was, uh, king), TIME and NEWSWEEK were major sources of news, even if a week or more old. Now, the immediacy of the internet has pushed them and newspapers into irrelevancy. Who wants to read a paper today with yesterday's news? (We are spoiled by technology, but not all 'spoilage' is bad.) I also think the cost of printing a paper is killing them, those costs being everything from union contracts to paper supply and printing machine maintenance/upgrades.
Another way "to kill [the media's] power" is simply to kill them. A few examples would go a long way to helping the media have an attitude readjustment, if only from self-preservation.
I think what bothers me most is the fact that the media have all these Constitutional protections, yet cannot or will not do their jobs in a manner to benefit the public. I also think Diane Frankenstein's new push to declare who is a journalist will make the media a more protected class than it already is, to the further detriment of the Republic. The media get away with lies even after being caught by simply running a 'retraction', as if that will erase the story that is already out there. They remind me of lawyers who try to get evidence entered into a trial against the instructions of the judge. The jury is told to disregard the matter. But how do you unring a bell?
When there is outright fraud, no one is held accountable in a criminal court. Was Dan Rather ever arrested for fraudulently trying to throw the election in 2004? No, of course not. He was allowed to 'retire' and still will not publicly admit the TANG memos were forgeries. What sanctions did Candy Crowley face for sticking her fat face into a presidential debate? Praise from the media. What about CNN having a reporter* fake a newscast during the Gulf War? He was in a studio and acted like he was outside facing the threat of a gas attack? Nothing as no one knew about it for years. Then there was CNN paying Saddam for access, slanting the news in a pro-Saddam manner to keep that access. Any sanctions? No, just the token firing of Eason Jordan.
But like I said, it is the lies of omission which are the most damaging. A classic lie of omission was not reporting on Owebama's communist background. AT ALL! He was a 'moderate' (as if a commie can be a moderate anything; a moderate commie is like a moderate muslim: They both only exist in the land of unicorns). And if you dared to bring up his communist associations (his grandfather, his mother, his father, his mentor FM Davis, et. al.), you were racist. While Gingrich has more baggage than Louis Vuitton, he at least takes on the media, and which is why he is popular with conservatives. It's also the reason the media seek to destroy him as he attacks and mocks their unbridled and unelected power.
* Here it is in all it's fake glory.
CNN Fake Newscast Best Quality